The Clinton 'Crime Family' is on the Verge of Collapse

James Kallstrom, a former head of the FBI office in New York called the Clintons a 'crime family'.

Ex-FBI official: Clintons are a 'crime family' - The Hill, October, 30, 2016

During a radio interview with John Catsimatidis, former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom heaped praise on Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump before taking aim at the Clintons.

“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool
....

“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.

Scandals always seem to follow the Clintons wherever they go (i.e. Whitewater, Travelgate, Benghazi, private email server, Clinton Foundation, etc..) and they are just too numerous to cover! But wait, how come the Clintons have never been prosecuted for these alleged crimes? Maybe because there is a long trail of suspicious deaths (via suicide or murder) associated with these scandals. My advice to anyone dismissing this as 'conspiracy theory' is to do your own research and 

Google 'Clinton body count'. 

The odds that these deaths are just coincidence or random defy the laws of probability. To date, I have not heard of any suggestion that Donald Trump was ever involved in any suspicious deaths. Granted, there is no smoking gun evidence, but when Mr. Kallstrom called the Clintons a crime family, he may have been insinuating that they do in fact have people murdered to protect themselves. If so, he is courageous for speaking out.

Mr. Kallstrom is likely speaking on behalf of active FBI officials who are furious with FBI Director Comey for not indicting Hillary Clinton. It is no surprise that according to reports, the FBI is under internal strife. The push-back against FBI Director Comey has led to the recent reopening of the investigation.

Resignation letters piling up from disaffected FBI agents, his wife urging him to admit he was wrong: Why Director Comey jumped at the chance to reopen Hillary investigation - Daily Mail, October 30, 2016

James Comey's decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton's email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.

It will be interesting to watch how this investigation plays itself out. Allegedly, Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton's assistant) has a file marked 'Life Insurance' on her estranged husband's computer and Eric Braverman (former CEO of the Clinton Foundation) is in hiding. Hint: they know about the body count.

The Most Damaging Wikileaks site is a great compilation of emails implicating Hillary and Bill Clinton.

Regardless, unless there is an indictment soon, this will just be another lost cause.

So, where is the investigative reporting by the mainstream media on this? As Thomas Jefferson once wrote - our liberty depends on the freedom of the press. The alt-media (i.e. Infowars, Breitbart) have been at the forefront.

Back in May, the National Review made a similar case as Mr. Kallstrom: The Clintons: New York’s Sixth Crime Family - National Review, May 27, 2016

Unfortunately, there has not been much investigative reporting from the mainstream media. There has been so much enmity and frustration that Mike Adams has gone so far as to call for the arrest of journalists!!

See the list of 65 presstitutes who colluded with the Clintons to defraud America and steal the election... CALL FOR THEIR ARREST - October 28, 2016

In truth, the leftist media is staffed by presstitutes -- media whores who have sold out to the Clintons in exchange for "access" to her bogus news releases (i.e. planted false narratives). As reported by The Free Thought Project, all the following "journalists" are seditious whores who should no doubt be arrested, indicted and prosecuted for engaging in criminal collusion and racketeering with the Clintons.

Hopefully, it won't come to that point.

Although just a step but maybe there is some hope....

Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside - Chicago Tribune, October 29, 2016

If ruling Democrats hold themselves to the high moral standards they impose on the people they govern, they would follow a simple process:

They would demand that Mrs. Clinton step down, immediately, and let her vice presidential nominee, Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, stand in her place.

Democrats should say, honestly, that with a new criminal investigation going on into events around her home-brew email server from the time she was secretary of state, having Clinton anywhere near the White House is just not a good idea.

Since Oct. 7, WikiLeaks has released 35,000 emails hacked from Clinton campaign boss John Podesta. Now WikiLeaks, no longer a neutral player but an active anti-Clinton agency, plans to release another 15,000 emails.

Hillary Clinton Reveals Nuclear Secrets During Debate

In light of Hillary Clinton questioning the fitness of Donald Trump for the Presidency, we can confirm that Mrs. Clinton has in fact jeopardized national security in the most recent debate and should herself be considered unfit for the Presidency.

Pentagon: Hillary Clinton Should Be Arrested For Leaking Top Secret Nuclear Intelligence on National TV - True Pundit - October 20, 2016

Hillary Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense personnel.

Clinton, responding to opponent Donald Trump and a question posed by debate moderator Chris Wallace, boasted specific and “damaging” details about the United States’ nuclear response time to retaliate during a nuclear attack. Clinton said:

“But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton, National TV Appearance

“Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in-chief,” a top-ranking DOD intelligence source said. “What she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”

According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass, including the following “need-to-know” (NTK) officials:

•     President
•     Vice President
•     Secretary of State
•     Secretary of Defense
•     Secretary of Homeland Security
•     Attorney General
•     Director of National Intelligence
•     CIA Director
•     Deputy Secretary of State
•     Deputy Secretary of Defense
•     Special personnel designated solely by the President in writing

Sources said late Wednesday Clinton likely violated two different types of Dept. of Defense SAP protocols. Since nuclear response is part of the sensitive national plan for nuclear war operations, all of its schematics are covered under both “Intelligence SAPs” and “Operation and Support SAPs,” sources said. Both contain Top Secret information.

“Targeting options by ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missiles), air or sea, launch order, launch procedures and response are some of the most secretly guarded tenets of national security and nuclear war policy,” a Pentagon source said. “It’s truly incredible that (nuclear) response time as part of an ERO (Emergency Response Option) is now out there in the public domain to our adversaries.”

U.S. Defense sources said according to developed U.S. counterintelligence, military officials in China, North Korea, Syria, Russia, Iran and even actors like ISIS had no previous definitive intelligence to determine the U.S. nuclear response time, especially during an ERO, prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday night. Sources reluctantly acknowledged her calculations were accurate.

“Any time frame calculated would have merely been an educated hypothesis, absent leaked documents and there have been no such breaches,” the DOD source said.

Mrs. Clinton has steadfastly laid blame on the recent Wikileaks hacking revelations on Russia. She even had the chutzpah to call Mr. Trump a 'puppet' of the Russian government. Unsurprisingly, her confirmation is more hot air.

The Fact That 17 Intelligence Agencies Confirmed Russia is Behind the Email Hacks Isn’t Actually…a Fact - Rebooting Capitalism, October 20, 2016

The “17 agencies that actually confirmed” it was the Russians? Well it turns out that was one guy, namely DCI James Clapper: the head of US intelligence. The same man who committed perjury before congress after his NSA surveillance program was leaked.  He  issued a statement that included the phrase:

We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

The very next sentence is also of interest:

Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government.

The word “confirmed” does not appear anywhere in this statement.

So when HRC stated the “17 intelligence agencies have confirmed” I was anticipating what that would turn up in the “fact checking” apparatus, which allegedly exists to objectively test the assertions of both candidates in real time.

So, we must be in some kind of upside down universe where the candidate that actually damages national security implies that her opponent is a traitor and unfit to become President.

Conspiracy Theorists are Vindicated - Shadow Government Proven True

Numerous members of the media critiqued Donald Trump's comments at a rally in West Palm Beach, Fl last week. As referenced here, he charged that Hillary Clinton meets 'in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors'. This week's FBI release vindicates the so-called 'conspiracy theorists' who have claimed that a secret force actually dictates government policy.

New FBI release on Clinton email probe refers to 'Shadow Government' - CNBC, October 17, 2016

One revelation in the documents came from an interview with an unidentified person who suggested that Freedom of Information Act requests related to Clinton went through a group sometimes called "the Shadow Government."

"There was a powerful group of very high-ranking STATE officials that some referred to as 'The 7th Floor Group' or 'The Shadow Government.' This group met every Wednesday afternoon to discuss the FOIA process, Congressional records, and everything CLINTON-related to FOIA/Congressional inquiries," the FBI's interview summary said.

That group, according to the summary, argued for a Clinton document release to be conducted all at once "for coordination purposes" instead of on a rolling basis as would normally be the case. But the "Shadow Government" did not get its way, and the agency in charge decided for a rolling release, the FBI summary said. 

As to who might be in control of this 'Shadow Government', I suggest viewing this post for starters.

Trump's JFK Moment

We are starting to get an idea of what Donald Trump meant when he stated: “the shackles have been taken off” - Trump declares war on GOP, says ‘the shackles have been taken off’ - Washington Post - October 11, 2016

At a rally in West Palm Beach on October 13, Donald Trump framed the election in the following context:

Trump: “Hillary Meets In Secret With International Banks To Plot Destruction Of US Sovereignty” - Infowars, October 14, 2016

The Clinton regime is at the center of this power structure. We have seen this first hand in the Wikileaks document in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.

Take a look at what is going on. They have stripped away these towns bare and rated the wealth for themselves and taken our jobs away, out of our country, never to to return unless I am elected president.

As noted in the article, the Wikileaks emails prove these allegations to be 100% correct.

Mr. Trump also stated the following:

Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe and morally deformed. They will attack you. They will slander you. They will seek to destroy your career and family. They will seek to destroy everything about you including your reputation.

Wait, don't we have proof of that from the 2008 election via JournoList that these so called journalists will make anyone out to be racist?

The fix was in - New York Post, July 25, 2010

JournoList, an online gathering place for several hundred liberal journalists, academics and political activists

JournoList’s members included dozens of straight-news reporters from major news organizations, including Time, Newsweek, The Associated Press, Reuters, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Politico, Bloomberg, Huffington Post, PBS and a large NPR affiliate in California.

The Washington Independent’s Spencer Ackerman, for instance, suggested an effective tactic to distract from the issue would be to pick one of Obama’s critics, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”

Regardless, the mainstream media universally derided his comments using the word 'conspiracy':

Donald Trump Blames Sexual Assault Charges on Global Conspiracy - Fortune
Donald Trump Imagines Shadowy 'Conspiracy' Behind Women Accusing Him of Misdeeds - NBC News
Donald Trump Has a Grand Unified Campaign Conspiracy Theory - Time
Trump Calls Sexual-Assault Claims Conspiracy to Defeat Him - Bloomberg

No surprise as Vox plays the anti-Semite card:
It’s time to acknowledge reality: Donald Trump talks like an anti-Semite - Vox

Let's make one thing clear, none of these statements are even remotely anti-Semitic. They are completely true - for further reference go here and here. Anyone making anti-Semitic claims is either a tool for the global elites, severely misinformed or a complete fool.

In addition, Mr. Trump is in company with many prominent politicians who have alluded to 'conspiracies'.

President Eisenhower referenced the Military–industrial complex right before the end of his 2nd term:

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.

President John F. Kennedy in his Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961 referenced 'secret societies' and a 'monolithic and ruthless conspiracy' (no, he was not referring to the Soviet Union).

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Senator Daniel Inouye (United States Senator from Hawaii from 1963 to 2012) spoke about a 'shadowy Government' during the Iran-Contra hearings.

[There exists] a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.

Congressman Larry McDonald was called 'the most principled man in Congress' by Congressman Ron Paul and said:

[T]he drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control ... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

For additional reference, see this site: Former Presidents Warn About the “Invisible Government” Running the United States

President Kennedy was born into a family of great wealth. He served honorably in World War II. Although he came from a privileged background, he was never an elitist. He became president and saw things that needed to change. His pursuit of making those changes cost him his life. With the shackles being taken off, Donald Trump is identifying the real problems with our country and is trying to make a difference. There can be no substantive argument that his election is a scam and that he is working on the side for the Clintons or for the global elite. Let's hope he is successful.

Are we heading for war with Russia?

US Army Chief Mark Milley did his best General Buck Turgidson (see Dr. Strangelove) impersonation this week when he threatened war with Russia.

US Army chief Mark Milley fires terrifying threat to Russia over Syria - The Sun, October 6, 2016

Only yesterday four Nato nations were forced to scramble fighter jets when Russia sent two bombers on a sabre-rattling run around Western Europe.

And yesterday Milley roared: “I want to be clear to those that wish to do us harm.

"I want be clear to those around the world who want to destroy our way of life and those of our friends and allies.

"The US military, despite all our challenges, will stop you, and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before.

“We will destroy any enemy, anywhere, any time.”
....
Milley added: “Other countries like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea went to school on us and closely watched how we fought.

“They are rapidly modernising their militaries today to avoid our strengths in the hope of defeating us at some point in the future.”

Maybe General Milley should wake up to the fact that there will be no winner if a war between the United States and Russia goes nuclear.

These two articles will provide a good sense of where the Russians stand on Syria.

Russia & China Combining Forces in Syria - The Common Sense Show, October 5, 2016

Russian options against a US attack on Syria - The Saker, October 5, 2016

Bottom-line is that Russia will not back down. Is it really in the United States' interest to risk a conventional or nuclear war with Russia over Syria? Is it really going to destroy our way of life if the military does not intervene?

Fortunately, members of the armed forces have previously stood up to the President (or whoever else is making the decisions).

As Seymour Hersh reported on the previous attempt to attack Syria to overthrow Assad back in 2013:

Pentagon Mutiny on Syria Dismissed by ‘Liberal’ Media - Huffington Post, Dec 26, 2015

for more than two years, senior U.S. military leaders subverted President Obama’s strategy to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad

Let's hope that history repeats itself.

Reasons Why Trump Insults People

The recent comments by Donald Trump in response to individuals who have attacked him can be characterized (at best) to be unconventional.

Here are the three possible reasons for his behavior:

1. Strategic
He views any media coverage as good so his provocative comments get him free publicity

2. Personality disorder
He is so egotistical and cannot stand being put down by anyone that either
    a. he cannot control himself and must respond
        or
    b. he can control himself but doesn't think his insults will matter so he does it anyway

3. Compromised
He is secretly colluding with Hillary Clinton to throw the election to her

Let's hope for the country's sake that the answer is 1 and not 2 or 3.